Depop Sells Status, Not Stuff

Hey, I’m Isaac 👋 I founded Pistachio, where we’ve worked with brands like BuzzFeed and Clay to understand their audience, build trust and deliver measurable outcomes through content-led growth.

If you want to chat about your own strategy, book a free call here.

Two out of five items in the average Gen Z closet are secondhand. But when you ask why, 47% say thrifting is "trendy". Not practical. Not economical. Trendy.

The secondhand apparel market is estimated to be worth $367 billion by 2029, growing 7x faster than traditional retail. This isn't about affordability. It's about what these items represent.

Gen Z don't want mass-produced fast-fashion. They want culturally significant artifacts.

The difference matters. Commodities are interchangeable, mass-produced and anonymous. Artifacts have provenance, history and meaning. When you buy a vintage band tee it's more than just fabric and ink. You're buying the story of who owned it before, where they found it, how they styled it. You're buying identity you can showcase.

No brand has turned this insight into a business model better than Depop. They built a platform where every item becomes a prize worth discovering.

Because Gen Z's real currency isn't dollars. It's cultural capital.

If Millennials tried desperately to fit in, Gen Z tries desperately to stand out. Status comes from being singular. Buying secondhand does three things at once:

79% of Gen Z agree that wearing vintage clothing is trendy. But the status comes from finding the piece and sharing that process, not just wearing it.

That's why "Depop haul" videos get millions of views. Each discovery becomes meaningful because of the story around how it was found, who wore it before and what it represents. The same t-shirt bought brand new is something anyone can access. Found it on Depop? Then it signals you have taste.

Depop has 30 million registered users, 90% of which are Gen Z. But those numbers barely scratch the surface of what they've actually built. According to Tracksuit data, awareness among 18-24 year-olds sits at 57%, with consideration at 47% and preference at 29%. That preference number jumped 18 percentage points year-over-year.

The conversion data tells you everything you need to know. Among 18-24 year-olds, 82% of people who know about Depop actually consider using it. The category average is 63%.

That 19-point gap comes down to identity alignment.

Most brands would look at Depop's platform and see problems to fix. The product descriptions are rambling, personal and sometimes barely coherent. Sellers post photos of themselves modelling items in their bedroom mirror.

That's why Depop becomes a stage for showing off cultural capital. The community creating haul videos, building followings and making the platform part of their personal brand prove more than just great organic marketing. That's the product working exactly as designed.

Which brings us to the uncomfortable question every status brand eventually faces.

Status requires exclusivity. When something becomes accessible to everyone, it stops being a status symbol. This is the tension Depop faces right now, and there's no easy answer.

Tracksuit's data reveals that while Depop completely owns their Gen Z demographic, total market awareness sits at just 21%, compared to eBay (80%), Poshmark (70%), or ThredUp (45%).

The brand perceptions tell the same story, where Depop uniquely owns "youthful", "trendy" and "stylish" associations in Tracksuit's imagery dashboard.

The significance of these perceptions is huge. In the Women's Secondhand Apparel category, whether customers think a brand "is for people like me" drives consideration 5.3x more than any other factor. It's not about having the best prices or the slickest shopping experience. It's about identity recognition. When Gen Z sees Depop, they see themselves.

Any cultural artifact requires shared context to maintain its meaning. But, importantly, when you grow beyond the community that understands the references, these items risk becoming commodities again. Just cheap secondhand clothes that save money, not cultural objects that signal taste and accumulate capital.

Depop’s Gen Z fortress is nearly impenetrable, and they own the category conversion driver in “is for people like me”, but to grow they need to win over other demographics. The problem then is that Gen Z status symbols die when other generations adopt them.

As one marketing professor explained it, "Part of how [Gen Z] see themselves is not being millennial, is not being a Boomer".

When your mum starts shopping at the same store as you, it's not cool anymore.

Supreme saw this happen. When the brand got too big and middle-aged dads started wearing box logo hoodies, the cultural cachet evaporated. Other luxury brands deal with this constantly. The moment "everyone" can access something, exclusivity disappears and status along with it.

The growth playbook says "expand your addressable market". The status playbook says "exclusivity is your moat". These strategies don't play nicely together.

Gen Z are driven more by identity than affordability. Product features matter less than what the purchase signals about you.

The chaos and friction that Depop maintains is a form of filtering rather than an inefficiency. It ensures only people who "get it" stick around. Everyone else self-selects out.

But what makes Depop's challenge fascinating is that the secondhand apparel category is fairly evenly distributed across age groups, despite Depop being heavily over indexed on Gen Z. So the opportunity for growth exists, the question is how to capture it without diluting what makes you special to your core.

One potential path could be separating the supply side from the demand side. Older demographics have the vintage items in their wardrobes. Gen Z wants to buy them. Depop could focus on acquiring older sellers while maintaining their Gen Z buyer identity. The platform becomes a bridge between generations, but the cultural capital and curation aesthetic stays firmly Gen Z. Different communities can coexist on the same platform as long as their respective cultural codes stay intact.

Depop could follow a similar model. Instead of diluting "youthful" and "trendy" to appeal to broader demographics, they can lean into micro-communities. Vintage band tees. Y2K aesthetics. Sustainable fashion. Each niche maintains its own cultural codes while sharing the same platform infrastructure.

Where most brands treat community as an audience to broadcast to, Depop knows they're the real asset. When users create haul videos, build followings and make the platform part of their personal brand, they become the distribution engine.

Gen Z wants to accumulate and display cultural capital. But that only holds value when it's recognised by the right community. That's why Depop's chaos and friction matter. That's what transforms commodities into artifacts that can actually carry meaning. Remove the friction and you're back to selling interchangeable products that don't signal anything.

The brands that win are brave enough to let specific communities own specific spaces exclusively, even if it means saying no to some potential growth opportunities. Because when you're selling cultural capital, accessibility can destroy the very core of your value proposition.

If you enjoyed this post or know someone who may find it useful, please share it with them and encourage them to subscribe: brandchemistry.co/p/depop-sells-status-not-stuff

Interested in sponsoring these emails? See our partnership options here.

The Modern Media Masterclass walks you through how to use organic content channels to build your brand and business.

Get the clarity and direction you need to turn content into a growth engine that drives brand trust and business results. Flat fee. No contracts. No lock-ins.

I’ve worked with brands like BuzzFeed and Clay to launch, grow and monetise organic content channels that drive real business results. Book a call today and lets see how I could help you.