Hey, I’m Isaac 👋 I founded Pistachio, where we’ve worked with brands like BuzzFeed and Clay to understand their audience, build trust and deliver measurable outcomes through content-led growth.
If you want to chat about your own strategy, book a free call here.
Presented by Roku
CTV ads made easy: Black Friday edition
As with any digital ad campaign, the important thing is to reach streaming audiences who will convert. Roku’s self-service Ads Manager stands ready with powerful segmentation and targeting — plus creative upscaling tools that transform existing assets into CTV-ready video ads. Bonus: we’re gifting you $5K in ad credits when you spend your first $5K on Roku Ads Manager. Just sign up and use code GET5K. Terms apply.
Interested in sponsoring these emails? See our partnership options here.
LEGO’s Community Moat
In 2003, LEGO posted an $800 million loss.
They were making too many different parts. Cost overruns were mounting. Sales were collapsing. One of the world's most beloved brands was on the brink of bankruptcy. The turnaround playbook any other company would’ve run was obvious. Simplify the product line, cut costs, refocus on their core customer segment of children.
But buried in this crisis was a very unusual signal.
Adult were using Lego to build elaborate custom creations and sharing their designs online. Communities were forming. Conventions were happening. Passion was intensifying.
In 2008, LEGO launched Cuusoo in Japan, a platform that became LEGO Ideas globally in 2014. The concept was simple but unprecedented. Let these “Adult Fans of LEGO” submit product designs, let the crowd vote on them, and let LEGO actually produce the winners.
Not as a one-off marketing stunt. As an entire business model.
They were essentially handing over product research and development to the people who loved them most. It's the kind of move that would terrify most brand managers. Lose control of your product line? Let amateurs design what goes on shelves? Risk your brand integrity on fan whims?
But LEGO understood what they’d stumbled onto and leveraged it to turn them into the world’s most valuable toy brand.
Why most community initiatives fail
Walk into any marketing conference (or Linkedin comment section) and you'll hear the same advice. "Build community! Engage your audience! Co-create with customers!"
Then watch those same companies launch “suggestion boxes” that collect dust, run one-off campaigns that generate buzz but zero lasting value, or worse, pander to every loud-minority fan request until their brand becomes an incoherent mess.
Most companies interpret that advice in one of three ways.
They launch a “suggestion box”. Brands ask for ideas, get thousands of submissions, then either ignore them (eroding trust) or cherry-pick the safest ones (missing the point entirely).
They run one-off campaigns that generate buzz but zero lasting value, but that's treating community as a marketing tactic instead of a strategic system. You get a spike in engagement, maybe some PR coverage, then it fades because there's no engine keeping it running.
They pander to every loud-minority fan request until their brand becomes an incoherent mess. Giving fans what they want doesn't mean scaling your brand equity. Popularity contests produce lowest-common-denominator wins that might sell once but dilute everything that made your brand distinctive.
What LEGO did differently wasn’t their enthusiasm for community. It was their governance.
LEGO built dual gating into their system. First, the crowd validates demand through a 10,000-vote threshold. No internal resources are invested until public interest proves it's real. Then an internal review board assesses brand fit, feasibility, margin economics, and IP viability.
They created clear and tangible incentives. Designers whose concepts get produced earn 1% royalty on worldwide sales, plus attribution. So creators aren't just contributing, they're actually financially invested in success. This transforms the relationship from "brand asking for free ideas" to "brand sharing upside with collaborators".
The LEGO Ambassador Network formalises the bridge between brand and community. It enables user groups to engage directly with LEGO to translate feedback in both directions, capture qualitative insights, and build trust over time. This isn't customer service. It's strategic infrastructure.
IP protection happens through transparent terms, licensing frameworks and brand safety rules published upfront. Everyone knows the game before they play it.
All of this governance is what transforms a community campaign into a business model. Without structure, co-creation becomes chaos or lowest-common-denominator wins. With structure, it becomes a true competitive advantage.
How the flywheel works
The genius of LEGO Ideas isn't any single element. It's how the pieces connect into a self-reinforcing system.
Ideas flow in constantly. Fans submit designs through LEGO Ideas, the intake valve for thousands of concepts. There's no barrier to entry. Anyone can submit. The platform becomes a living catalogue of what fans actually want to build and buy.
Selection happens in two stages. Gate one is the crowd. Designs need 10,000 community supporters to advance. This pre-validates demand before LEGO invests a single dollar in development. It also creates public buzz and media attention that compounds visibility. Gate two is LEGO's internal review board. They assess strategic fit, production feasibility, margin requirements, licensing constraints and brand alignment. Not everything popular gets made. Only things that make strategic sense.
Signal reduces risk to almost zero. By the time a concept reaches production, it's already proven. Ten thousand people have publicly committed interest. The creator becomes an advocate, amplifying launch through their networks. Marketing budget drops because the community does the work. Risk is almost entirely eliminated.
Scale happens strategically. LEGO produces limited runs to test market fit, then extends lines if demand warrants. Results feed back into design norms. The community designers learn "what works". This creates a self-reinforcing quality filter where each cycle teaches both LEGO and fans what resonates.
Feedback makes the system smarter. Platform data reveals patterns in what gets traction. The Ambassador Network captures qualitative insights. Every submission teaches LEGO something about their audience. This isn't a campaign that starts and stops. It's an always-on learning system.
Each stage feeds the next. More submissions mean better selection. Better products attract more fans. More fans submit more ideas. The flywheel accelerates.
Why it became an unbeatable moat
Today, LEGO Ideas has launched over 50 fan-designed sets. But the real competitive advantage isn't the products. It's the engine that produces them.
Any company could copy the platform tomorrow. Build a submission portal, add voting functionality, set up a review process. The technology is very simple.
What they can't replicate is years of trust and reciprocity. The relationships, the norms, the self-reinforcing quality filters that have been learned through thousands of submissions. You can't buy community knowledge of "what works", or community devotion to making things work. It has to be earned through consistent, fair, transparent collaboration over time.
Network effects compound the advantage. More submissions lead to better selection, which creates stronger products, which attract more fans, who submit more ideas. The flywheel accelerates with each cycle, and every turn makes the moat deeper.
The economics are pretty brutal for competitors. Other toy companies invest in R&D, production and marketing before knowing if anyone cares about the product. They're guessing. LEGO has 10,000 pre-orders before production starts. R&D risk is distributed across a motivated community who become advocates. When a product launches, demand is pre-validated and marketing is essentially outsourced to creators.
Co-creation creates belonging, which transforms brand relationships. Fans aren't just customers, they're co-owners. This lifts preference intensity and willingness to pay in ways traditional marketing simply can't match. You can't buy this kind of brand love. It has to be earned through reciprocity.
The community isn't helping design products. The community IS the competitive advantage.
What this means for other brands
The principles aren't toy-specific.
B2B software companies can systematise feature requests with voting and pre-order commitments. Consumer product brands can run design submissions with community selection. Service businesses can build client-led innovation programs with structured governance.
You need an engaged audience, a systematic process, governance discipline and commitment to make it someone's actual job rather than everyone's side project.
Most brands treat community as an audience to broadcast to. The strategic shift is treating community as an asset to build with. Not through one-off campaigns, but through systematic co-creation.
From bankruptcy to unmatched advantage
LEGO went from an $800 million loss to the most valuable toy company in the world. The turnaround wasn't about better products or smarter marketing. It was about recognising that their biggest asset wasn't bricks, it was the people who loved building with them.
They built a system that turns passion into products and fans into strategic advantage.
Not through one-off campaigns, but through systematic co-creation with real governance. Not by asking "what do fans want?" but by building the infrastructure to harness what fans create.
Your brand probably can't replicate LEGO's platform, but you can steal the thinking. Every engaged customer is potential R&D and marketing, if you build the system to harness it.
The question is whether you're willing to build the structure that makes co-creation work.
What sacred ground is your industry afraid to hand over to its customers?
If you enjoyed this post or know someone who may find it useful, please share it with them and encourage them to subscribe: brandchemistry.co/p/lego-community-moat
When you’re ready, here’s 3 ways I can help you
The Modern Media Masterclass walks you through how to use organic content channels to build your brand and business.
Get the clarity and direction you need to turn content into a growth engine that drives brand trust and business results. Flat fee. No contracts. No lock-ins.
I’ve worked with brands like BuzzFeed and Clay to launch, grow and monetise organic content channels that drive real business results. Book a call today and lets see how I could help you.