a16z’s new media playbook

Hey, I’m Isaac 👋 I founded Pistachio, a B2B content agency working with brands like Atono and Clay to build trust, relationships and loyalty with their current and future customers.

If you want to chat about your own strategy, book a free call with me here.

Read time: 4 mins 14 secs

Interested in sponsoring these emails? See our partnership options here.

In September 2016, The Wall Street Journal published a story arguing that Andreessen Horowitz's fund returns trailed the venture-capital elite. Ben Horowitz, co-founder of the firm, later described the fallout as existential. Scott Kupor, the firm's Managing Partner, published a detailed rebuttal the same day, explaining exactly why comparing unrealised paper valuations across VC firms is methodologically meaningless. Nobody read it. The correction reached a fraction of the audience the original story did, and the damage held.

Andreessen Horowitz, known as a16z, had spent seven years becoming one of Silicon Valley's most prominent venture capital firms. They'd backed Airbnb, GitHub, Coinbase, and Lyft. But none of that insulated them from a single story they couldn't effectively answer. They had no channel of their own to make their case through. A handful of major publications controlled the narrative, and whatever they printed first stuck.

a16z drew one lesson from it. Own the channel.

a16z now runs what amounts to a mid-sized media company. Their podcast publishes five times a week. They have newsletters, a video team, and coordinated social across every major platform, with a dedicated New Media team that treats content production the way a startup treats a product roadmap.

Content is the vehicle. The audience is the asset.

Erik Torenberg, who leads the New Media team at a16z, made this explicit in a recent internal presentation. a16z can now reach 90% of the founders they care about directly, without going through any intermediary. For a venture firm, that's deal flow. It's also one reason the best founders choose them over competing term sheets. Being in the a16z orbit means something before you've signed a deal, because the content has already been doing relationship work for years.

For a startup, the same logic applies. An owned audience is a direct line to the people you most need to reach. You build it yourself, and unlike paid acquisition, it compounds.

Three products. All for portfolio companies.

The first is Launch-as-a-Service. A coordinated product launch operation covering social copy, video production, messaging, and rollout timing, designed to guarantee a viral announcement. The team has run this for multiple portfolio companies and tracked millions of views per launch.

The second is a go-direct motion for portfolio CEOs. Qasar Younis, the CEO of Applied Intuition, had never posted on X before. With support from the team, his first tweet got 4,000 likes. He now has a direct line to the engineers who might join, customers in adjacent markets, and journalists who know who he is. That's a growth channel.

The third is the New Media Fellowship, an eight-week program to find and train platform-native talent. Two thousand applications for the first cohort. Sixty-five accepted. The goal is to build a pipeline of people who understand how these platforms actually work, then deploy them to portfolio companies that need it.

Marc Andreessen, a16z's other co-founder, frames the current media landscape through the OODA loop, a military decision-making framework. Whoever cycles through observe-orient-decide-act the fastest wins. The Wall Street Journal has a 24-hour editorial cycle. Internet-native platforms run on a 24-36 hour viral half-life. Traditional media is permanently chasing the internet, which means owning internet-native distribution puts you upstream of where attention forms.

Andreessen also draws on Marshall McLuhan's idea that the medium shapes what content it can carry. A tweet is oral culture, even though it's written. Short, stripped of context, built to provoke. A long-form podcast is written culture, even though it's spoken. It forces depth, argument, nuance. Every time Andreessen has gotten into trouble on Twitter, it was because short-form stripped context, and context is the only thing protecting a complex idea from being misread.

Long-form is context insurance. The piece you spend two hours recording is what makes a viral post land correctly when it does.

Platform fluency matters for the same reason. The a16z team has a dedicated expert on every major channel, including an 18-year-old named Hiro who runs their Instagram and grew up native to it. Their Instagram following is up 35% month-on-month. That growth doesn't come from cross-posting. It comes from someone who understands the platform's specific logic. Every platform compounds differently. Treating channels as distribution points for the same asset doesn't compound at all.

The professional CEO was trained to say nothing.

The risk/reward math in the old media world made it rational. A handful of major outlets, 24-hour editorial cycles, no real counter-channel. One misquoted sentence could define you. So CEOs learned to speak in a way that couldn't be misquoted, which meant speaking in a way that couldn't be remembered either.

That's a growth failure in the world we're in now.

Anduril is the clearest case. They have brand presence in defence circles that a company their size has no business having. None of it comes from advertising. It comes from founders and executives who are genuinely worth paying attention to. The inbound from that, in recruiting, in partnerships, in public perception, doesn't show up cleanly in a CAC spreadsheet, but it absolutely drives the business.

Having a point of view, and saying it consistently, is how a founder-led company earns attention it didn't pay for.

The 2016 WSJ story is a story about dependence.

When a16z were reliant on other people's channels, they were permanently exposed. Being filtered, ignored, deprioritised whenever something more urgent came along. The rebuttal failed because they had no channel to send it through, no audience of their own to receive it.

Companies that build owned distribution early create an asset that's very hard to close later. The ones that don't stay dependent on intermediaries. And intermediaries have their own priorities.

The physics are the same whether you're a VC firm or a B2B startup.

File this under growth, not PR. The companies that get the most from a new media strategy aren't the ones waiting for a crisis. They're the ones building distribution before they need it, so that when they do, they already own the channel.

The content is the channel. Build it like infrastructure.

If you enjoyed this post or know someone who may find it useful, please share it with them and encourage them to subscribe: brandchemistry.co/p/a16z-new-media